× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. November 2004

RE: Named Activation Groups

I would suggest to run programmes, written in RPG IV, to run in a named 
activation group (AG). 
The exception is service programmes. All the *SRVPGM run in one AG: I would 
name it SRVICES.

Only the need for batch jobs to run in different AGs beats me, so I stick to 
the default, QILE.

Just my thoughts.

Regards,
Carel Teijgeler

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 9-11-04 at 14:21 Colin Williams wrote:

>I have been previously rapped on the knuckles on this list for suggesting
>use of ILE programs in the default activation group by use of DFTACTGRP(*NO)
>ACTGRP(*CALLER). I was told it could cause all sorts of weird and wonderful 
>things to happen.
>
>But this is still the way I do it. Im not recommending it to anyone else,
>but I've always done this, and have yet to experience any problems with it.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.