× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: CarollaT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:CarollaT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 4:11 PM
> To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CHAIN to a DS
> 
> 
> [CWilt wrote]
> 
> How about:
>  
> 1) Not having to update anything!...
>  
> 
> [/]
> 
>  
> 
> Nope.  32 files max in SQL.  This is 60+ files (67 currently).  
> 
>  
> 
> But don't think I didn't consider that before even building these
> 'conglomeration' files.  
> 

Opps, didn't think about that.  <grin>


>  
> 
> Seriously though, how fast do you think a 67-file union SQL, 
> over files
> containing a total of around 30-40 million records, would 
> run?  This would
> involve summarization... 
> 
>  
> 

Well, I don't think it's going to be any worse than a single file with 67*40
million records.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it, a view can make use of
indexes on the underlying tables.


Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.