RE: Compile error when using field in a subfield data structure

Unless you are still using array to do sub-file programming, you action is 
conflicting with your statement.  

If subfile is, as you mentioned, hard to understand/learn, IBM should have not 
introduced it into RPG and we should continue using array for sub-file screen.  
I don't know about you, but I sure do not want that.

It is hard only because you are not using it everyday.  RPG programmers, 
including me, are so use to fix form that free-form looks confusing to us.  
However, I think if we start to use it, it will become natural to us.



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jderham2@xxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 6:47 AM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Compile error when using field in a subfield data structure


In a message dated 5/12/2004 12:49:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, rob@xxxxxxxxx 
writes: 
> Some people just don't want to learn...
> I bet when they came from a S/36 to the S38 or iSeries they didn't want to 
> adopt this subfile thingy either.  Why, when arrays work perfectly fine? 
> Geesh I hate that mentality.
Don't knock it Bob unless you were there and went thru the learning 
experience.

Jack Derham
Direct Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.