|
Han: I don't know I would want to volunteer myself to ask for restriction on coding standard :). Bob: +=, -=, ++... are also not allowed. Too c like. Scare the head out of most people when it is too c like :). Other than that, I think I'm okay to use all the rest of stuff RPG is capable of. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Hans Boldt Actually, I find it strange that your shop standards would disallow free-form calcs but allow other even more recent functionality like fully qualified names. If you want to fully take advantage of deeply nested data structures, it would seem that free-form calcs is pretty much a co-requisite. You might want to reconsider your shop coding standards one way or the other. That is, either allow free-form calcs or also disallow defining subfields with LIKEDS or LIKEREC. Cheers! Hans
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
