× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



>Oh give me a break.  Aaron, I'll let you in on a little secret: XML IS
TEXT.

So is a .gif or .jpg, but can you compare that to csv's?  No.  Just like XML
is not nearly the same as a csv.  Are they more alike than a .gif?  Yes.

<Joe>
Great, then feel free to quit talking.  Because 350 bytes a message is
important.  On the new wave of communications devices (cell phones and
the like) with effective rates of around 28kbps or less, 350 bytes of
overhead (700 for each round trip) means you can't even send five
messages a second.  That's a ridiculous tradeoff just so some Hiphop
Code Jockey doesn't have to actually write code.
</Joe>

Joe, just say that XML over broad band isn't that bad.  You can't dispute
that.  You can move the discussion to say that transferring XML with floppy
disks takes longer, but that is not what I was saying was a good use of XML.

Unless I am mistaken (just because I have only read about them and not used
them) there are separate standards for sending stuff to cell phones, PDA's,
RF's, etc. . . WML comes to mind.  


Aaron Bartell

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.