Re: Service pgm signatures - use *current & *prv or not

> In the Club Tech iSeries newsletter (edited by Scott Klement), the author
> (I can't tell if it was actually Scott or not) suggests you use your own
> signature, and that you just add new exports to the bottom of the list.

Yep, that was me.  I write most of the tips in the newsletter, if there's
one from someone else it will be attributed.


> This seems *very* straightforward, and I'm thinking about suggesting this
> for our shop standard (there is not one right now).  Any reasons why we
> *shouldn't* do this?

This was discussed on this mailing list in-depth back in June of last
year.  Here's the thread:

http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/200306/threads.html#00351

In particular, read this message from Barbara.  She demonstrates the
various different approaches to signatures, and demonstrates them,
coming to the conclusion that the single-signature apporoach is best:

http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/200306/msg00455.html