|
"It discriminates against any field name not directly, or RENAMEd, from the file." I have not renamed any field from this file. I am using EXACTLY the field names in the way they are in the record layout. However, I needed to move on with the project and I re-coded my logic to use regular RPGIV coding and using just one UPDATE operation code. The problem is gone. However, I am still unclear about the way the built-in-function should work then. Based on your feedback, will this means that an array reference like: MPPLB(RunQtr) ... will be invalid when using %FIELDS because the index "RunQtr" changes the field to be one "not in the file"? As a result, if I want to use %FIELDS effectively I need to specify the "field name" IN THE WAY IT APPEARS ON THE RECORD LAYOUT? Can you (Rob/List) elaborate a little about this? Am I out of focus here? Peter Vidal Pall Aeropower Corp. SR Programmer Analyst WWW.Pall.com "A good player makes himself look good; a great player makes the team look good." Author unknown
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
