× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. August 2003

Re: %Len vs. %Size in %Replace

Bill,

At 8/26/03 08:58 AM, you wrote:
I'm on v5r1 and they both work for me with your code.

That's odd. Note that I was using the %SIZE and %LEN directly in the %Replace BIF, not with an intermediate variable. That's what didn't work for me.


The only problems I see is when your

"%Scan( 'qqqqqqqqqq': String ) :" dosen't get a hit on anything you get "The target for a numeric operation is too small to hold the result"

That's not a problem in this case, since it's coming from a compile time array. Also, there are no VARYING fields to contend with.

-mark


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.