× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yeah, and Hans, what would have happened if the budget for the next year 
was greater than the budget 5 years ago?  Suppose that would have really 
made a difference to Steve?  After all, that is possible.  5 years ago was 
what, V4Rsomething?  All rather big sleepers compared to V5.

Some people aren't happy until they get that "one personally important 
enhancement".

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 





Hans Boldt <boldt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/13/2003 02:07 PM
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries

 
        To:     rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        Re: v4 vs v5 rpg. was Prototypes, /COPY and LIKE()


Steve Richter wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Buck
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Prototypes, /COPY and LIKE()
> 
> 
> 
>>>You have to get a laugh at the hypocracy of IBM however.
>>>On the one hand they say that RPG is dead,
> 
> 
>>Citation, please?  I have never heard IBM say RPG is dead; exactly the
>>opposite.
>> --buck
> 
> 
> You cite first!  Because of the conspiracy, there will not be any IBMers 
on
> the record stating that RPG is history.
> 
> A proc centered rpg makes features like a static free rpg very doable. 
Once
> rpg or its derivative is static free, then the language can be thread
> capable, can handle exceptions better, ...  The point being that there 
are a
> lot of ways that rpg can be improved.  Yet, there are no v4 to v5 like
> improvements planned.
> 
> What is the current year IBM r/d budget for rpg?  what was it 5 yrs ago?

Huh?

(rubs eyes in disbelief)

LOL!

This is hilarious! So a possible reduced rate of RPG enhancements 
means RPG is dead? So we not only have to continue to enhance the 
language, but do so at an *increased rate* to demonstrate that RPG 
is not dead?

Thanks Steve, you really made my day!

Cheers! Hans


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.