|
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, DeLong, Eric wrote: > > We will be having a review of shop standards soon, and I've been asked to > assemble a "pros and cons" list for the O-spec -vs- Prtf topic. Our current > standard recommends O-spec, but exceptions come up occasionally. [SNIP] This is going to be a "holy war." You know that, right? In my shop, I've deliberately decided NOT to make this part of the "company standards". I've decided on the "use the best tool for each project" approach, which has worked pretty well. One thing you didn't mention, that you might consider, is what you're going to need to do in the future. As computers continue to evolve and improve, I think you'll find the need to be able to code things like lines, fonts and graphics. Requiring people to use the more limited O-spec approach might make things look like a "legacy system" if you're not careful.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
