RE: Alternate Platform for RPG

What were your results?  You only said that you saw a difference. . .???
Was one faster than the other?  Was one harder to develop? etc . . .

>1 - Tomcat, sql, data queue, client access server, api etc...
What were you trying to do here with all of the different components?

Aaron Bartell

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Leon [mailto:s.leon@isys.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:04 AM
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Alternate Platform for RPG


I made a web interface (between banking database and web server for order
management).
using the 2 two ways.
1 - Tomcat, sql, data queue, client access server, api etc...
2 - Rpg and socket

And every body's testing the 2 tell me if i am serious, with
java version.
I used a simple spool --> html converter in java and
another using native api.
I see the difference again.

Its just to me a performance question in my humble opinion.

--
Stephane


>Just wanted to comment on this even though I think you mostly said it in
>jest.  Java performs very well when it has all of its classes loaded and
>when you don't have to start the JVM.  You can achieve this on the iSeries
>by using Tomcat or another application server, WAS maybe. . .  The first
>call is going to be the only one that is slow and after that it performs as
>well as RPG.  I have not done any sophisticated timing on this, so it is
>based on human perception and not actual programmatical time-testing.

>I agree that calling Java directly from RPG is incredibly slow though.  I
>have yet to find a way to make this happen faster.

>Aaron Bartell

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.