Re: ILE philosophy

Gary,

>The question was, why do it differently?
>
>How about security for one thing.

I suppose that could be true, but I have not had a scenario where that was the
case -- or at least where I realised it was. <g>  What scenario did you have in
mind?

>Depending on design, it might be advisable to use named AG for cleanup
>reasons.

I haven't used JNI yet, nor anything else where I wan't able to control the
activation group of the caller.  So it hasn't been an issue for me.  Yet. ;-)

>One module per zervice program - hard to do when you have RPG and CL
>(one example) code you want to include in a service program.

I guess I live a sheltered live.  All of my service programs so far have been
strictly RPG.  Maybe I should consider some CL's using RTVxxx commands where my
usual MO is just to call an API.

Doug