RE: ILE philosophy

I believe one binding directory for every program is overkill and way too
much maintenance.  A service program in a binding directory that isn't used
by the program in no way affects the final program object, not in size or
execution.  By referencing your compile options in the H spec there is no
need to do the CRTPGM step anyway, all compiles can use the CRTBNDRPG
single-step compile.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Duane [mailto:djohnson@POWERMATE.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: ILE philosophy
>
>
>   I am a definite advocate of the "one module - one service
> program" school
> of thought.  As a matter of fact, I take it one step farther.
>  I have one
> binding directory for each program.  The binding directory
> has the same name
> as the program.  Since I use PDM for the compiles, I have created a
> user-defined option that does the Create Program function and
> expects to
> find the binding directory.  It helps to make life simple.
> Also, listing
> only those service programs that I'm going to be using in my
> program, saves
> on allocated space when the service program is opened.
>   Oh, one other thing.  EVERY module that I write is wrapped
> in a service
> program.  So, when one is changed,  NO recompiles are
> necessary for any
> program.
>
> Duane
>