Re: More SQL precompiler

Nelson, John, Rolf, and others:

<snip>
I don't get it. Why do we all need to start filling out DCR's for the
PRE-COMPILER to support the standard features of the compiler itself? Isn't
that implied? Isn't that the least that we should be able to expect?
<endsnip>

Frankly I agree.  And that was my original thought when I entered my
concerns into the IBM arena.  Perhaps I was seduced once I went into there.
I think I couldn't see the forest because the trees were in the way.

How do you suggest you get them to actually accept that the dang
precompiler should just accept everything that the language supports?

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin