× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Steven,

>From my perspective, only, your view of IT Manager's acceptance of RPG
IV is exactly how I see it I most IT shops I teach at.

Bob Cozzi
cozzi@rpgiv.com
Visit the on-line  Midrange  Developer  forum at: http://www.rpgiv.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]
On
> Behalf Of steven.ryan@denso.com.au
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:43 PM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: ILE adoption rate
>
>
> Buck
>
> You forget a third group - those who would like to go to RPG IV/ILE
but
> can't, because of management decisions.  For those in this position,
it is
> with increasing alarm that we see developments such as procedures,
> pointers, free RPG, etc. that makes us feel that not only have we
missed
> the boat, but it is rapidly disappearing over the horizon.
>
> I know there are a number of people who have told this list that you
can
> always convince the boss to at least try it.  However, there can be
very
> real barriers to this.  In my case, I work with one of over 2 dozen
> subsidiaries around the world who use the same, Head Office supplied
> software.  Any changes have to be (at least partly) justified on the
basis
> that other subsidiaries can use them.  And we can't use a language
(i.e.
> RPG IV/ILE) that is not in common use every where else (Ever heard of
Catch
> 22).
>
> Trying to convince my manager of the benefits of change is useless, as
he
> must follow a policy dictated by the overseas Head Office.
>
> Funnily enough, the previous place I worked at 4 years ago had EXACTLY
the
> same situation and philosophy.
>
> So Buck, while I'm not happy with the status quo, I am forced to
accept it.
> And if IBM make newer RPG versions too radically different from RPG
III, it
> will get harder still to try to get a change in the philosophies I
must
> work under.
>
>
>
> The vast majority of RPG programmers are happy with the status quo and
> regard changes to the language with suspicion.  The other group are
annoyed
> that RPG isn't moving into the present fast enough.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.