Re: MOVE opcode in freeform (was Strange behavior w/%editc)

John wrote:
>One of the things preventing this from happening is the limitations of the
>language with respect to the shared namespace. In order for me to use a
>publicly available service program with RPG, I have to hope that the
>author's naming convention doesn't clash with my own internal standards.
>Qualified procedure names would go a long way towards making your wish
come
>true.

I would accept that argument IF people complained about namespace
collision.

I do agree that there should be some mechanism to qualify
procedure names, but until there's a consensus that a solution is
needed, we can't really justify the enhancement.

No, I think you have to look elsewhere for excuses for the lack
of a "Comprehensive RPG Archive for Modules and Procedures".
(Please someone come up with a better acronym than that!)

Cheers!  Hans

Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com