RE: RPG ILE and *INLR

OK - here's the thing;
        All the sub-programs/binding/stuff makes
1) Bigger Code (more memory)
2) Bound Code
3) Slightly easier to understand - since we're making our own
functions...
4) Slower Code (from second hand tests.... So nobody yell @ me...)

The memory saving dynamically linked "CALL"  W/O *INLR takes 200ms (old
number?) to load into memory ONCE- then it's there until it shut's down.

Polite programmers have written "when I send you a '1' here - you shut
down all nice like" that Joe is talking about, but honestly - when the
people signed off, the same thing happened anyway..

Does anyone have current benchmarks about this?

Andrew Borts / Webmaster
Seta Corporation
6400 East Rogers Circle
Boca Raton, FL 33499

E-mail: Andrewb@setacorporation.com
Corporate web site http://www.setacorporation.com
E-Commerce web site http://www.palmbeachjewelry.com
                              http://www.myfreeitems.com
Voice: 561-994-2660 Ext. 2211 / Fax: 561-997-0774

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:32 PM
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RPG ILE and *INLR

AGH!  I DIDN'T CHANGE THE STUPID HEADER!

I apologize.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com
[mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]On
> Behalf Of Joe Pluta
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:30 PM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: Official language of midrange.com (was RE: SQL)
>
>
> Here's a question: in good old RPG III, I often used the technique of
> calling a program repeatedly without setting on LR.  I usually
> had a control
> program that, at the end of its processing, then called each of the
> subprograms and told them to shut down.  Each subprogram then seton LR
and
> ended.
>
> This was excellent for performance, and at the same time cleaned up
the
> subprograms between calls to the control program.
>
> In my move to RPG ILE, I'm wondering how to handle this.  I'd
> like to change
> the called programs to bound calls (CALLB), and then bind them
> all in.  If I
> do a CALLB to a program, what are the effects of *INLR?
>
> 1. If the called program does not set on LR, I assume that
> subsequent calls
> do not go through the initialization, just like in the old OPM CALL
> situation.
>
> 2. If the calling program sets on LR and then ends, does this in
> effect set
> LR on in all the called programs, clearing them from the PAG?
> That is, the
> next time I call the control program and it in turn does a CALLB to
the
> subprogram, does the subprogram go through initialization again?
>
> 3. If I set on LR in a called program and it returns, does that in
effect
> set on LR in the calling program?
>
> Just wondering.  I'm going to do some tests to confirm all the
> above, but I
> wondered if anyone else had run into this and could provide some
insight.
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.