RE: binding directories

Mike,

I would put the service programs into a binding directory.  Then I would use
the H-spec in the programs to specify the binding directory and activation
group info.  Then all the compiles can be done with default options and no
need to create the module objects for the programs.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Mike [mailto:Mike_Smith@RGCResources.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:21 AM
> To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: binding directories
>
>
> I'm just looking for what other people are doing.
> assume i have
> pgm1 and srvpgm1 and srvpgm2
> pgm2, srvpgm1, srvpgm2
> pgm3, srvpgm1, srvpgm2, srvpgm3
> pgm4, srvpgm1, srvpgm2
>
> In this scenario, pgm1, pgm2, pgm3, pgm4 are all within the
> same system.
>
> would you typically,
>
> A.    Not create binding directories at all.
> B.    Create 1 binding directory for all of these and just add to the
> binding directory for additional programs
> C.    Create a separate binding directory for each program.
> D.    Other- please explain
>
>
> As i said, i'm just looking for how others are doing these
> kind of things,
> to better how i'm handling these types of things.
>
>
> Mike Smith
> Information Systems
> RGC Resources
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
>