RE: Validate Object Attribute

Fran Denoncourt wrote:

> Well, list, valid values table etc (I wouldn't REALLY hardcode in pgm!)
> would all mean the list is dependent on someone in MIS maintaining it.
> But, you brought up a valid point. The problem is we need a quick way to
> promote to production. I'm a contractor and made mention of the
> fact that I
> had over 200 objects to promote and I'd write a quick CL to run through a
> list of objects to send through their commands.  The data files are done
> manually - CRTDUPOBJ.  So, now, it will be a  'quick' application for
> everyone else. I'm not writing change management software - not really.
> It's supposed to be serviceable but not really elaborate - a temporary
> solution.

You don't need the to specify the attributes for this; object name, library
and type uniquely identifies an OS/400 object. The object attribute is just 
that,
and attribute, like object text.