RE: H ActGrp('QILE') vs H ActGrp(*caller)

Rob,

Our approach is to compile programs to run in a named activation group such
as QILE and for all service programs to run in *CALLER so they run in the
same activation group as the program that is using them.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:20 AM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: H ActGrp('QILE') vs H ActGrp(*caller)
>
>
>
> When I first started using a service program I set up some
> default H spec's
> to be copied in using /copy for the programs using the
> service program, and
> for RPGLE programs in general.  In this copy member I have
> the following:
> H ActGrp('QILE')
>
> Some developers have requested that we be able to change this to
> H ActGrp(*CALLER)
> This will help make
> ErrorFlag=system(cmd);
> work better.  In cases where cmd is an OVRDBF.  I know I can
> workaround
> with OVRSCOPE.
>
> Any comments on the ramifications of this change?
>
> The concepts of service programs, subprocedures and the like
> are catching
> on here and I want to do everything I can to not stand in the way.
>
> Who would have thought to document their H specs?  :-)
>
>
> Rob Berendt
>
> ==================
> A smart person learns from their mistakes,
> but a wise person learns from OTHER peoples mistakes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
>