RE: Size of source physical files

Jade Richtsmeier wrote:
> 
> Is there any reason why you can't define all source physical files to 112,
> like ILE requires?  At my current employer, they have the ILE source files
> defined at 112, but DDS & CMD defined as 92.  They are under the 
> impression
> that PF, LF, DSPF, CLLE, CMD, etc. source files can't be defined 
> as 112.  At
> a previous employer we had everything in once source file, and I don't
> recall any problems or issues with it.  Am I missing something?

If I remember correctly the only "problem" I've had is that SEU wraps 
the lines as if the record length was 92 for some member types (e.g. CL & CMD);
after prompting the lines.






+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---