× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: 2 d arrays was RE: Basic Cobol
  • From: "Emilio Padilla Taylor" <epadilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:08:54 -0600
  • Organization: Padilla Asociados

I think the price scheme if good enough, now, everything depends in how they
will evaluate the results.  I wouldn't count votes, I will count money.  For
example, 1 $4 vote is 1 vote the same as 1 $20 vote.  But, the person who
voted was thinking more like, my $20 vote should weight 5 times more than my
$4 vote (at least that the way I voted).  So, 185 4$ votes is $740, 185 20$
votes is $3700. Which function you thing the voters are more interested in?

Emilio Padilla


----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Herrin" <therrin@isaac.net>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Miércoles 31 de Enero de 2001 04:46 PM
Subject: Re: 2 d arrays was RE: Basic Cobol


> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:30:22 -0500, Jon.Paris@hal.it wrote:
> >it all"  Sometimes you have to choose between features.  e.g. Do you want
> >one $20 feature or would you get more mileage from 5 $4 functions?
> >
> >I think it works pretty well.
>
> The problem is that a $4 function will get more votes than a $20
> function because it costs less and more people will be able to
> "afford" it out of their $100 allotment.  If a $20 function gets
> almost as many votes as a $4 function, it tells me the $20 function
> must be wanted.  Many people were willing to pay the more expensive
> price to vote for it.  If you don't weight the results, you will
> always be doing the cheaper ones, because the expensive ones will fall
> to the bottom due to their higher cost.
>
> Terry Herrin
> Sr. Programmer/Analyst
> New Hanover Regional Medical Center
> Wilmington, NC
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.