Re: Character to Numeric

[boldt@xxxxxxxxxx]

Gary wrote:
>How would cvtefnd compare?

(...against other character to numeric methods.)

I don't know.  I think there's a bug with "cvtefnd" on our
V5R1 development machine, so I haven't run any comparisons.
(My next e-mail goes to the MI folks in Rochester!)

Since "cvtefnd" returns a long float result, it would suffer
from the same accuracy problem that "atof" has.  It also has
the extra overhead of interpreting currency symbol and
thousands separator, so I would expect it to be slower than
"atof".  If you need to handle formatted numbers, I'd go with
Barbara's "getnum" procedure.  It's both robust and can handle
numbers with greater precision than long float can represent.

Cheers!  Hans

Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@xxxxxxxxxx

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-sub@xxxxxxxxxxxx.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNsub@xxxxxxxxxxxx.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@xxxxxxxxxxxx
+---