RE: Timestamps

Thank you,  I could not remember micro as 1 millionth.  Drew a blank and
went with nano which is a billionth, right.  Boy does this bring back
memories..8>)
  

Have a great Thanksgiving,


Christopher K. Bipes    mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.        http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive   Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928  Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000

-----Original Message-----
From: McCallion, Martin [mailto:MccalliM@Midas-Kapiti.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 9:15 AM
To: 'RPG400-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: Timestamps


>  Can an 24 way 850, with a zillion disk arms, write 
> more than one record a nano second?  Perhaps the next generation will.

Timestamps don't go to nanoseconds (1e-9), only to microseconds (1e-6).

Oh, and I did once find a bindable API that purported to generate them
to the millisecond, but I couldn't get it to work, and went with DB
field approach.  I don't recall the details, as it was several years
ago.

Cheers,

Martin.
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---