Re: Logical File: CONCAT vs SST

Unfortunately, you are reading that correctly.  Also, be aware that any
new fields you create with SST will be output only fields, another big
disadvantage.

I'm not sure how to do what you want to do.  (Take the first 3 chars from
3 different fields and make a key out of 'em).

Regards,

Jim Langston

Ted Barry wrote:
> 
> I have a client that needs access to our Land Management database.  In
> particular our key is assessors parcel number (APN) 3 separate fields
> that comprise the APN.  Each field is 6A, so total length of 18.
> 
> My problem is the database we're trying to link it to only uses the first 3
> pos. of each of those fields (9A total).  The numbers are said to match
> up, which I'm not concerned about...
> 
> The frustrating thing is the syntax of SST in a logical, according to the
> book, the field that I'm SSTing into has to exist in the PFILE.  Am I reading
> this correctly?  I could use CONCAT, but don't think this is acceptable to
> the client. Why is it that you can create fields using CONCAT, but can't
> w/SST?  This seems really stupid and is causing me a major headache.
> I'd hate to have to create another file, just to satisfy my clients
> request...Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ted J. Barry
> Programmer/Analyst
> Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
> 5019 Imhoff Place
> Martinez, CA 94553-4392
> (925) 229-7389
> (925) 676-7211 fax
> tbarry@centralsan.dst.ca.us
> http://www.centralsan.org
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---