× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If this file has only a few records, load it at init to a table.  The first
field in the table is the unique key.  The second is the length of the
entire record format.  I use an externally described DS and move the second
field to the DS to get the record layout.

Another solution, if you have amble memory, is to create a memory partition
large enough to hold the entire file.  Then a small program reads the entire
file and goes into a wait.  If this is the only job run in the memory
partition, it will remain cashed in memory.  Other jobs will take advantage
of this.

Yet another way is to load  the file into a keyed data queue and use the
message peek to retrieve the record without removing it.

If the application will allow, presort the master file by the key of the aux
file and only read the aux file at level break.

We use a mixture of all.  What I have not tried is a user space, but that is
another possibility.

Hope this gets you think-in.



Christopher K. Bipes     mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst   mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.         http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive    Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928 Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000


-----Original Message-----
From: Contractor1@parkdalemills.com
[mailto:Contractor1@parkdalemills.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:17 AM
To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
Subject: Accessing a file in memory



We have a project where a few files are accessed a lot in a job stream and
the job takes over an hour to run. We are looking for ways to speed up the
process. We are wanting to load the few files into memory rather than
accessing the files off the disk because we heard that a company that
purchased the same software did the same. Can you advise us on what might
be the best solution? User space, what?

Thank you,

Patrick Conner
www.ConnecTown.com
(828) 244-0822
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.