Re: a little bit of confusion

>1. I have never seen a case where the Factor 1 value for BEGSR is different
>than the Factor 1 value for the ENDSR. Is this not strange?

>2. Also, I am
>familiar with GOTO (but don't use it) and CABEQ. However, I thought that
>both GOTO and CABEQ were supposed to be associated with TAG. There is not
>tag named WRTR99 anywhere in the source. Can GOTO and CABEQ be used with the
>factor 1 value for BEGSR or ENDSR?


This is not strange. All it is doing is defining an (exit) tag for the
subroutine.
Yes, both CAB & GOTO's must (if  RESULT field defined) reference a TAG or an
ENDSR TAG

Its the same as:

      WRTR99      TAG
               ENDSR

Your code is slightly odd in that the line: FIELDA           CABEQ
WRTR99
will not compile as the Factor 2 filed is mandatory (WRTR99 is the Result field
TAG).

Mike


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---