Re: Performance issue: open/read PF vs open/read SRCPF

I wouldn't waste a single minute on this.

Invest the time in good planning and good coding; there's a lot more time to
win/waste there.

A source physical file is pretty much the same as a physical file with
MAXMBRS(*NOMAX) and a DDS with the fields SRCSEQ, SRCDAT and SRCDTA. I've
never noticed any difference from the performance point of view between
them.

0.02 Euro

Anton Gombkötö

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Jin" <brucej@mrc-productivity.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 8:34 PM
Subject: Performance issue: open/read PF vs open/read SRCPF


> I wonder how much difference there is (in terms of performance) when I use
> a physical file versus a source physical file. Assume I do OVRDBF, OPEN,
> READ, CLOSE in RPG. The record lengths for both PF and SRCPF are the same.
> The PF has only 1 or 2 fields in it. Both PF and SRCPF have 500 records.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---