× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: CALLP vs CALLB vs EXSR
  • From: "David Shea" <dshea@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:16:14 -0500

I did some tinkering with CALLB vs CALLP related to a web application.  All
I can tell you is before, using CALLP, the response time to get the page up
was 15 seconds or more.  After changing to CALLB, response time dropped to 5
seconds or less.  I don't know just what the he*& was going on with the
difference between callp and callb, but it sure made a HUGE improvement.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Time share a current model AS/400 over the internet!
Individual developers, company development and testing, or full outsourcing.
Get access to RPG, Cobol, C, SQL, Java, web development and more for a low
monthly fee.
http://www.timeshare400.com
mailto:timeshare400@arctools.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

----- Original Message -----
From: "McCallion, Martin" <MccalliM@Midas-Kapiti.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 10:33 AM
Subject: CALLP vs CALLB vs EXSR


> We've just been having a conversation here about the relevant
> performance of prototyped and non-prototyped procedures.  It seems that
> some of my colleagues did some benchmarking while I was seconded to
> another department.
>
> They discovered that, for the same function, processing large volumes of
> data, coding subroutines performed significantly faster than procedures;
> but also that non-prototyped procedures using CALLB were faster than
> prototyped ones using CALLP.
>
> I'm not surprised by the former, but I'm astonished by the latter.  Why
> should this be so?
>
> I wasn't involved in the testing, so I can't give you much more info; I
> should add, though, that we're at V4R3, and everything would have been
> compiled without optimisation.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin.
>
> --
> Martin McCallion
> Midas-Kapiti International
> Work:  mccallim@midas-kapiti.com
> Home: martin.mccallion@ukonline.co.uk
>


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.