× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: SV: C style assignment of variable values
  • From: "Denis Robitaille" <DRobitaille@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 10:11:23 -0400

Here is my 2 cents on this:

I think that those who want the C syntax could achive it by purchasing the C 
compiler. (Sorry if this sound rude, I do not mean to)

For me (with no C background) A+=1 is not more meaningfull than A = A + 1

I can easyly code a procedure like: CALLP inc(A:1) to achive the same thing 
right now.

When  the CF spec becomes available, I will code:

Inc(A:1) or Increment(A:1)

I also do not like the idea of providing too many ways of doing the same thing. 
When you do that, you end up with PL1 and this can also make programs harder to 
maintain.

Example: shop A as a standard for incrementing of :   A = A + 1
                shop B as a standard for incrementing of :   A +=
                shop C as a standard for incrementing of :   A = *same + 1

If someone from shop A has to maintain code from shop B or C, He must first get 
acustom with this coding style.

At the present, shop A,B and C have the same standard: A = A + 1 because it is 
the onlyt way to go.


Denis Robitaille
Directeur service technique
Cascades Inc
819 363 5187
fax 819 363 5177


>>> "Torbjorn Gortz" <torbjorn.gortz@swipnet.se> 10/06 5:55 PM >>>

Hans Boldt wrote:
> But, we have no problems with the idea of +=, -=, /=, etc.
> A+=1 really isn't much more difficult for programmers to ...

How about:  A = *same + 1
It is longer to code but it is looks like an RPG-syntax,
and I think it is clear to almost everyone what it means.
You then could insert the *same-word anywhere in
the expression, as many times you wish.  
If you use long varible names it could be an alternative.

I still want the  A+=1  to work, though.
I mean the *same-word as an alternative

Torbjorn Gortz
Sweden

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.