Re: null capable fields

Jon,

At 02:18 PM 9/6/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Simple fact of the
>matter is that most people don't even know such things exist. Of those
that do,
>a large percentage don't see the point in using them.  Even among SQL users
>(where it really makes sense tom use them) I've found that most people often
>don't use them.

 On the /400, since the automatic null support is weak, there's little
reason to use it.  Traditionally, a blank or 0 value field means no value
or invalid value.  This is the assumption and the applications were
designed to assume that.  What would null support give you that a blank /
*zero value wouldn't?

 -mark

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---