× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Recreation of service program using binder language
  • From: "Stone, Brad V (TC OASIS)" <bvstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:25:17 -0500

Could you post your binder language?  And if you have /COPY for your
prototypes, that may help as well.  Or just the prototypes.  Or you can mail
them to me and I can look at them.

Bradley V. Stone
BVS/Tools
http://www.bvstools.com




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Jodat [mailto:jodat@dakosy.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 2:49 AM
> To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Recreation of service program using binder language
> 
> 
> David Morris wrote:
> 
> > Frank,
> >
> > You didn't mention whether you are using updsrvpgm or crtsrvpgm,
> > but if you are using crtsrvpgm, you need to specify all of 
> the modules
> > or binding directories that define exports in the service 
> program.  The
> > missing export should be listed in your low level messages. 
>  Make sure
> > that you have specified the module that contains this export.
> >
> > One other thing you may or may not be aware of is that the 
> new export
> > should be added at the end of the *CURRENT block.  If you add it in
> > the middle, you will find your programs calling the wrong 
> procedures.
> >
> > David Morris
> 
> David,
> 
> I have used crtsrvpgm to recreate the service program. It 
> consists of only
> one module with five procedures including the new procedure I wrote.
> This new procedure is the last entry in my list of current 
> exports. The funny
> thing is when I recreate the program without using the binder 
> language source
> in QSRVSRC it compiles just fine. If I use binder language 
> the compilation fails
> with error message CPD5CE5 complaining the new procedure ( = symbol )
> couldn't be found although it's defined in the module.
> 
> Regards,
> Frank Jodat
> 
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
> RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.