Re: CF-Spec - another call for opinions

Bob Cozzi wrote:
> 
> I don't plan on voting FOR any of the options, but I definitely want a vote
> AGAINST option 4!!!

Haleluyah...


> 
> I'm trying to understand.  Coding "CF" in columns 6-7 then using free form
> with special symbols and parens and all the rest of it is some how
> faster/cheaper/better than what?  I restate my opinion... Just enhance CL to
> support database I/O and add a few more structured operations. It has to be
> easier than turning RPG into a crap language.
> 

OHH, OOOOHH! Teacher! I know! Pick me!

Let's just add SQL precompiler support to CL, after all REXX had it, or
is that just OS/2 again?!?!


-- 
===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional System Administrator
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional Network Administrator

"The sum of all human knowledge is a fixed constant.
    It's the population that keeps growing!"
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END