×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 21:53, <daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wireless isn't fast enough. ÂEven wireless N, which doesn't work
that well in my house anyways, isn't going to cut it.
If you do get a single ethernet cable to a switch/hub they will still be
sharing that single cable. ÂThat's a constraint itself.
Yes, but 100mbit Ethernet shared with 8 endpoints is still going to be
loads faster than Wireless N with 8 endpoints in realistic conditions.
Remember, the advertised 300 megabit are _without_ wireless management
overhead (which plain old Ethernet doesn't have). With one endpoint,
in a noise free environment, you may get up to 150 megabit/s
throughput. But as soon as you get more endpoints, this will decrease
dramatically.
Wireless is not the answer.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
