× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yes, for relaying.

I started experimenting with Blat. I was able to send via relaying
through smtprelay.dilgardfoods.xxx (a server here in the office) which
does TLS. But when I tried going directly to smtp.gmail.com, it
didn't like it.

Here's the log:

2009.08.25 16:22:02 (Tue)------------Start of Session-----------------
Blat v2.6.2 w/GSS encryption (build : Feb 25 2007 12:06:19)
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 220 mx.google.com ESMTP
j39sm138076waf.45
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): >>>putline>>> EHLO xxxxxxxxx
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 250-mx.google.com at your
service, [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 250-SIZE 35651584
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 250-8BITMIME
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 250-STARTTLS
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
2009.08.25 16:22:03 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 250 PIPELINING
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): Sending stdin.txt to itnotify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): Subject: Windows server JLCROSBY1 is shutting down
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): Login name is xxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): >>>putline>>> MAIL FROM:<xxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 530 5.7.0 Must issue a
STARTTLS command first. j39sm138076waf.45
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): The SMTP server does not like the sender name.
Have you set your mail address correctly?
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): >>>putline>>> QUIT
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue): <<<getline<<< 221 2.0.0 closing connection
j39sm138076waf.45
2009.08.25 16:22:14 (Tue)-------------End of Session------------------

Notice I xxx'ed out some things, but they were correct in the actual
log. I ass-u-med google was requiring TLS.

I thought by each server going out _directly_ to google, then I
wouldn't be worrying about a mail sender server still being up.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Walden H.
Leverich<WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
See:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/237154/windows-scripting-to-email-usi
ng-tls

Although I find it hard to believe that Google _requires_ TLS. Certainly
it can't be a requirement for sending email _to_ Google, is it a
requirement for relaying through them?

-Walden

--
Walden H Leverich III
Tech Software &
BEC - IRBManager
(516) 627-3800 x3051
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
http://www.IRBManager.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

--
This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing list
To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.