× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'd still say the extra money for 3.4+GHz isn't worth it in your
situation.  You may do better to get an extra GB of RAM instead.  BTW,
Kingston & other 3rd parties have compatable RAM that's a fair bit
cheaper than IBM-brand:
http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=19842&;
mfr=IBM&model=eServer+xSeries+226+%288648&Sys=19842-IBM-eServer+xSeries+
226+%288648-xxx%29&distributor=0&submit1=Search

Hey, my comments were made as someone who uses a 15K boot disk on his
home PC.  Yeah, it is a ton faster (my wife's PC had a 10K SCSI disk).
The question, though, is how important is disk performance after things
load up?  WDSC, WAS, Java, etc. are RAM pigs; more RAM may be a better
choice than the more expensive disk.

Re: External USB drive for backup: Good choice.

Ah yes, the MS dev thing.  Great choice.  Definitely the way to go for
your needs.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.