× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I have four 32-MB sticks of EDO to swap around.

Also wondering if anyone can recommend a thorough memory checker that can
pinpoint the modules that have problems.  Interesting M$ sidenote about this
(in KB article 134503) - note the qualifier "Some":

"Defective memory chips may not be detected by memory checking tools. Some
memory checking programs are not adequate tests because they do not test RAM
in the same way that Windows uses RAM. Most memory checkers use read/write
cycles when scanning memory. Since Windows is executing code from memory, it
uses execute cycles. Execute cycles are different from read/write cycles and
are more vulnerable to parity errors. It is possible for memory checking
programs to find parity errors if the memory is extremely faulty."

Really hoping it's not the memory cuz the EDO's are getting rare &
expensive.  OTOH, this might be just the excuse I need to give the wife to
build a new box.  And use this one to run IPcop on.

db

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of John Brandt Sr.
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 10:25 AM
> To: 'PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users'
> Subject: RE: [PCTECH] Adventures in near(?)-futility
>
>
> Dan,
> Having had this same circumstance on many occasions, the memory error is
> probably the culprit. Neither Win95 nor NT nor 2K nor XP will create this
> error when memory is, in fact, bad. Win98, Win98SE and ME seem to be the
> only ones to create this error.
> I would change out the memory, or if it is multiple sticks and the board
> will support it, simply remove 1 or 2 if they are paired.
>
> John Brandt
> iStudio400.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Bale [mailto:dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:17 AM
> To: pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PCTECH] Adventures in near(?)-futility
>
>
> So anyway, the drive is partitioned and formatted.  I copy the Win98SE
> install CD to a partition I created on the end of the HD, do the
> setup thing
> and let it do its thing.  Everything is going perfectly, but...
> (ya know, I
> usually laugh at people who say "it's perfect except...")
>
> Through the course of installing drivers, I make sure that I reboot as
> required.  Even installing some stuff that doesn't request a reboot, I
> reboot anyway.  Unfortunately, Windows kept biting me with
> "Windows registry
> is damaged. Windows will restart and try to fix the problem" as
> soon as the
> Windows logo came up on the reboot.  This is a result of SCANREG /AUTORUN
> sensing some problem and issuing what I call an "idiot light" type of
> message.
>
> (BTW, I also got this on the first go-round with the Win98 install.
> Fortunately, I learned to use the Reg Checker in the System Information -
> Tools, and backup after I had successfully booted up; this saved me from
> having to reinstall drivers and re-change the settings I made.)
>
> Microsoft has several KB articles relating to this topic and one,
> KB 186909,
> talks about defective memory as a potential culprit.  Only problem I have
> with this is that I've been using this particular memory, 128MB EDO, for
> about ten months now, and had no reported problems using Win95.  Does it
> seem odd that Win95 had no problems running with it, and now Win98 is
> choking on it?  It appears that M$ built this in by design, as
> the "status"
> on this KB article is "This behavior is by design."
>
> I have a few more tests that M$ suggests to help isolate, but if
> anyone has
> comments or advice, I'm all ears.
>
> db
>
>
> --
> This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
> or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.714 / Virus Database: 470 - Release Date: 7/2/04
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.718 / Virus Database: 474 - Release Date: 7/9/04
>
> --
> This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
> or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.