× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



At last, political analysis that makes sense, a la Lewis Carroll....

        Poker With Dick Cheney
        Transcript of The Editors' regular Saturday-night poker game
with Dick Cheney, 6/19/04.
        
        The Editors: We'll take three cards.
        
        Dick Cheney: Give me one. Sounds of cards being placed down,
dealt, retrieved, and rearranged in hand. Non-committal noises, puffing
of cigars.
        
        TE: Fifty bucks. 
        
        DC: I'm in. Show 'em. 
        
        TE: Two pair, sevens and fives. 
        
        DC: Not good enough. 
        
        TE: What do you have? 
        
        DC: Better than that, that's for sure. Pay up
        
        TE: Can you show us your cards? 
        
        DC: Sure. One of them's a six. 
        
        TE: You need to show all your cards. That's the way the game is
played. 
        
        Colin Powell: Ladies and gentlemen. We have accumulated
overwhelming evidence that Mr. Cheney's poker hand is far, far better
than two pair. Note this satellite photo, taken three minutes ago when
The Editors went to get more chips. In it we clearly see the back sides
of five playing cards, arranged in a poker hand. Defector reports have
assured us that Mr. Cheney's hand was already well advanced at this
stage. Later, Mr. Cheney drew only one card. Why only one card? Would a
man without a strong hand choose only one card? We are absolutely
convinced that Mr. Cheney has at least a full house.
        
        Tim Russert: Wow. Colin Powell really hit a homerun for the
Administration right there. A very powerful performance. My dad played a
lot of poker in World War 2, and he taught me many things about life.
Read my book. 
        
        TE: He's extremely good at Power Point. But we would like to see
the cards, or else we can't really be sure he has anything to beat two
pair. We don't think he would lie to us, but ... well, it is a very rich
pot.
        
        Jonah Goldberg: Liberal critics of Mr. Cheney's poker hand
contend that "he doesn't have anything". Oh, really, liberal critics?
Cheney has already showed them the six of clubs, and yet these liberals
persist in saying he has "nothing". Why do liberals consider the six of
clubs to be "nothing"? Is it because the six of clubs is black?
        
        Matt Drudge: ****DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE****MUST CREDIT THE
DRUDGE REPORT**** The Drudge Report has learned that Dick Cheney has a
royal flush, hearts. Developing ...
        
        TE: Perhaps if you could just show us a subset of your cards
which beat 2 pair? Or tell us exactly what your hand is? 
        
        DC: We will show you our cards after we have collected the pot.
It is important that things be done in this order, otherwise the
foundation of our entire poker game will be destroyed. 
        
        TE: We aren't sure ... 
        
        DC: Very good. And here are my cards. A straight flush. 
        
        Judith Miller: Dick Cheney has revealed a straight flush,
confirming his pre-collection claims about beating two pair 
        
        TE: Those cards are of different suits. It's not a flush.
        
        Mark Steyn: When will it end? Now liberal critics complain that
Dick Cheney's cards are not all the same suit. Naturally, these are the
same liberals who are always whining about a lack of diversity in higher
education. It seems like segregation is OK with these liberals, as long
as it damages Republicans. 
        
        MD: ****DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE****MUST CREDIT THE DRUDGE
REPORT***
        A witness has come forward claiming that The Editors engage in
racial profiling in blog-linking. Developing ... 
        
        TE: Wait! It's not even a straight! You've got a eight and ten
of hearts, a six of clubs, and the seven and five of diamonds. You have
a ten high. That's nothing.
        
        Sean Hannity: Well, well, well. In another sign of liberal
desperation, liberals now complain that a ten high is "nothing". Does
ten equal zero in liberal mathematics? That would explain a lot. 
        
        Robert Novak: It's a perfectly valid poker hand. Apparently,
liberals have never heard of a "skip straight". It's a kind of straight,
just with one card missing. But if you skip around the missing nine,
it's a straight. 
        
        Alan Colmes: Mother says I mustn't play poker. 
        
        TE: There is no such thing as a "skip straight". 
        
        Brit Hume: It seems like some people are still playing poker
like it's September 10th. Back then, you needed to have all your cards
in order to claim a straight. But, as we learned on that day, sometimes
you won't have perfect knowledge. Sometimes you have to learn to connect
the dots, and see the patterns which are not visible to superficial
analysis of the type favored by the CIA and the State Department. Dick
Cheney's skip straight is a winning poker hand for the post-9/11 world. 
        
        Rush Limbaugh: Do The Editors have two pairs, or a pair of twos?
First they say one thing, then another. What are they hiding?
        
        Andrew Sullivan: Dick Cheney never said he had a straight. He
was very careful about this. His cards can form many different hands.
None of these hands alone can beat a pair of twos; but, taken together,
the combination of all possible hands presents a more compelling case
for taking the pot than simply screaming "Pair of twos! Pair of twos!"
as unprincipled liberal critics of the Vice President so often do. 
        
        MD: ****DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE****MUST CREDIT THE DRUDGE
REPORT**** 
        Did The Editors claim to have "a pair of Jews"? Are they
anti-Semites as well as racists?
        
        Developing ... Zell Miller: As a lifelong liberal Democrat, I
believe Dick Cheney, and I hate liberals and Democrats. 
        
        William Safire: Why are liberals so obsessed by Dick Cheney's
poker hand? The pot has been taken, the deal is done. If liberals are
upset that we are no longer playing by the Marquis of Queensbury
patty-cake poker rules, they clearly lack the stomach to play poker in
the post-September 11th environment. And why do they never complain
about Saddam Hussein's poker playing, which was a thousand times worse? 
        
        Christopher Hitchens: The Left won't be happy until the pot is
divided up equally between Yassar Arafat, Osama bin Laden, and Hitler.
Orwell would have seen this. 
        
        Ann Coulter: Why do liberals object so strenuously to the idea
of conservatives having a "straight"? Perhaps because it doesn't fit in
with the radical homosexual/Islamist agenda they hold so dear?
        
        Report of the Bipartisan Commission on Poker Hands: There is no
such thing as a "skip straight". 
        
        DC: I have access to poker rules that the Commission doesn't,
and so I know for a fact that the cards in my hand are all intimately
connected.
        
        George W. Bush: Dick Cheney is telling the truth. I'm a nice man
who would drink a beer with you. 
        
        Vladimir Putin: I dealt Dick Cheney three aces and two kings.
        
DC: My deal. 







As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.