× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 27-Sep-2016 11:31 -0500, Rob Berendt wrote:
Then there's always

SELECT "LIB1", "FILE1", Date-field,count(*)
FROM LIB1/FILE1
GROUP BY Date-field
ORDER by Date-field
UNION ALL
SELECT "LIB2", "FILE2", Date-field,count(*)
FROM LIB2/FILE2
GROUP BY Date-field
ORDER by Date-field
UNION ALL
SELECT "LIB3", "FILE3", Date-field,count(*)
FROM LIB3/FILE3
GROUP BY Date-field
ORDER by Date-field

and get it all in one spool file.


That statement is not syntactically correct, not even for COBOL ;-)

But more problematic is the [possible lack of, or quite likely undesirable] collation [per either lack of, or illogical, ORDER BY], depending on how the statement is redacted to get past the issue with the syntax.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.