× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. May 2016

Re: This is weird: program appears to run faster from a "real" library than from QTEMP

Hi James


No idea about the performance, but you don't need to compile into QTEMP to get a listing - just use the *NOGEN value in the OPTION keyword. The listing will still be created.


HTH

Vern


On 5/27/2016 12:31 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
This is weird.

I've got a program running on a customer box. Earlier, I'd recompiled it into QTEMP, in order to get a compilation listing, so I could determine why it was locking up. I put in a correction, and recompiled it into its usual library.

I then ran what I thought was the corrected version. But because that particular box has QTEMP at the top of the default user library list, I was in fact running the uncorrected version I'd compiled into QTEMP.

After it locked up, I got rid of the QTEMP version, and re-ran the corrected version. It seems to be running at least twice as fast from a "real" library as from QTEMP.

Any idea why that could be?

--
JHHL


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.