|
I've seen a nice slide on this and Mark hits it right on the head.
Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
From: "Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc." <mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04/13/2016 09:02 AM
Subject: RE: IBM i 7.3 Temporal tables
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
A journal is significantly more difficult to query, and performance would
be orders of magnitude better with a database table vs. a journal.
Mark Murphy
STAR BASE Consulting, Inc.
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----"Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04/13/2016 08:45AM
Subject: RE: IBM i 7.3 Temporal tables
What would be the difference between a temporal table and a PF that is
journaled?
Wouldn't a journal receiver be able to give you the same result?
Paul
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
