Re: Backups taking longer after reorg -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Backups taking longer after reorg
From: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:10:08 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 1/8/2016 9:47 AM, Richard Reeve wrote:

I did the reorg on those that had more than 10%
deleted

In Ye Olde Dayes, 'reorg' meant copy, delete, copy back. There is a
RGZPFM command now [since the 80s anyway :-)] and many people assume
that reorg means RGZPFM. But I'm old, and I've seen some things, so it
might be informative to see what commands were used to do the reorg.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.