× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yes, absolutely, excluding sources already fixed for the *MDY problem would
simplify my task significantly. I just have no automated method to make
that determination (of which I'm aware).

Are you possibly thinking that we might have some semblance of project
management here? ;-)

- Dan

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:04 PM, CRPence <crpbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Excluding sources already processed might be a simpler task.? Then just
scan those remaining, irrespective the possibility /hits/ might be from
what are in comments, and review the entirety. As I noted in my reply on
the WDSCI-l, the benefits of seeing what the comments might help
bring-to-light can actually have more value to such a project than what
eliminating the comments from the scans can achieve; and excluding review
of the comments may ultimately result in required changes being
missed\overlooked.

--
Regards, Chuck


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.