× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I second this...

In fact you can take it a step further...

Our application data is split between 5 libraries. But my daily save is
done in two parts, one uses SWA for the 3 library still being used
(modified) after 5pm. Then the other two are saved normally.

Charles




On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jim,

There should not be a problem with what you're suggesting, but I wonder if
your synch point is way too wide with *ALLUSR.

Instead consider the more limited list of libraries that need the
referential integrity synchronization across them. I'll bet that list is a
reasonably short one. Application 1 has library A, B, C, and D do a synch
point for those four libraries. You don't mention if you use BRMS but you
can very easily set up lists of libraries, each list having a synch point.

The other thing to consider is the "ragged save". See:
http://iprodeveloper.com/availability/ragged-save-while-active among other
resources for Ragged save. I think there is a Redbook about them too.
Ragged save requires journaling to be turned on in the collections
(libraries) where you use it.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim
Franz
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:07 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: SAVACT *SYNCLIB and SQL READ

Our warehouse product does a large number of sql reads (many at a time) to
pull big tables into the warehouse. Till now, we keep them from starting
till our SAVLIB with SAVACT=*SYNCLIB has reached it's checkpoint across the
libraries (*ALLUSR), which takes 30 minutes.
If the SQL is only reading (Select ...) then other than memory and cpu is
there any issue with both SAVLIB with SAVACT, and SQL Select at same time?
V7R1 (trying to narrow or remove the outage window with existing hardware)

Jim Franz
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.