×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I just got a security bulletin from IBM listing the following:
http://tinyurl.com/IBMiSecurityNews
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.nsf/ibmscdirect/997583A5C2CCE24C86257DE40057829B?OpenDocument&myns=i710&mync=E&cm_sp=i710-_-NULL-_-E
I submitted the following web feedback on the site.
<snip>
Can we get DNS Bind CVE's added to IBM Document 733566796?
I am getting critical errors from my outside security audit firm that I am
running an obsolete version of Bind that is susceptible to multiple CVE's
including:
CVE-2012-1667
CVE-2012-3817
CVE-2012-4244
CVE-2012-5166
CVE-2013-4854
It is my humble understanding of IBM policy to port over obsolete versions
of Bind to IBM i and patch them without upgrading the version of Bind it
reports. IOW, it still reports the bind level as 9.7.4-P1.V7R1M0. IBM
claims to have patched some of these CVE's but doesn't yet publicly list
them.
</snip>
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
