That's one of my goals is to make this stuff more of an MVC model so I can
have the UI for 5250 & via web (we have some users that refuse to give up
the 5250 screen!)
Thanks,
Tommy Holden
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/03/2014 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: how to determine cost savings based on resource
utilization
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+1
Rob Berendt
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/03/2014 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: how to determine cost savings based on resource
utilization
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:23 AM, <Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I don't really see how I can use this to make a "good" case to justify
the
need but every bit of ammo I can carry to management helps!
To be honest, I don't think there is much of a case to be made in
terms of higher performance or lower resource usage. As Rob says,
upgrading hardware helps. I'd add that for certain specific cases,
you *might* be able to upgrade software even without upgrading
hardware. If you can migrate to a version of the OS with a better JVM
and query engine, for example, that might get you some meaningful
performance gains.
But otherwise, all the ROI from updating/modernizing comes from either
improved functionality (such as a better user interface), or improved
maintenance and development.
John Y.
midrange.com
