× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I don't get this implied reasoning that if I am using SQL then it must
inherently be slower. First of all, neither is doing any database I/O so
index evaluation and all that jack is out of the picture. Once the code
is compiled it can be ran on a machine that doesn't even have the SQL
option installed so it's not like it has to call a bunch of external
stuff. (Ok, maybe I'm off here. Maybe the callable stuff is installed on
every machine with the OS. But if one can imply that imbedded sql is
inherently slower than I can imply the callable routines are not
installed.)


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.