×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
John,
Originally, was told the sbmjob would work, which it does most of the time.
This is a very slight timing issue.
A CL with a DO loop would work and is probably the simplest to implement.
Calling a pgrm to return the future date and time would also work, but not guaranteed as the DO loop.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Yeung
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:38 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: SMBJOB - with delay
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rob,
The reason for the separate job is you can't hold the AJS job while it running, can't hold yourself, nothing to do with authority.
Maybe I'm being dense (a very good possibility!), but I'm still not seeing why you can't just use a DO loop around the HLDJOBJS, which was Rob's *actual* first suggestion, which he dismissed out of hand because he figured you would already be using it if you could.
John Y.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
midrange.com
