× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Darryl Freinkel <dhfreinkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We have used it since it was available and it worked like a dream, no
issues. Timestamps could be an issue for some but they are not for us.
Timestamps are down to 6 decimals of a second so there should be no way to
get a duplicate based on the timestamp.

6 decimals (microseconds) is not very much. Very recently there was a
thread on this list discussing generation of unique names, and it
quickly became clear that lots of folks have found that using
timestamps for this purpose was not sufficient for avoiding
collisions.

During "time-stretching" periods (where the system clock advances
slower than real time), you'd have even higher chances of collisions
if you relied (solely) on timestamps.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.