MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » August 2014

Re: QSECOFR Profile Oddness



fixed

What do you mean by "see it signing on"? An actual telnet logon?
Jobs can still execute for a disabled profile. They are not "signing on",
they are just executing a job.

Jim Franz


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Matt Lavinder <
mlavinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Does anyone know much about how QSECOFR is treated? We did a penetration
test back in July and during the test QSECOFR was disabled. We did not
find that out until today. When we go to WRKUSRPRF it shows a successful
sign-on occurring Saturday (8/9). We IPL on Saturday, but it bugs us that
we see it signing on when it was supposedly disabled.

I am just looking for some peace of mind that this is what we should see.
When we discovered the profile was disabled we initially assumed it had
been disabled after that successful sign-on Saturday morning, but the only
disabled message we found in the logs occurred back in July.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.







Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact